Project Case Study

Propeller Thrust
CFD Simulation & Experimental Validation

Replace this with a short 2 to 3 sentence summary that explains what the project was, why it mattered, and what result or takeaway it delivered.

Tools SolidWorks / ANSYS Fluent / Arduino
Result Thrust followed expected T ∝ ω² trend, CFD validated by experiment.
Propeller thrust project team photo
01

Objective / Problem

What needed to be solved

Describe the engineering problem clearly

Predict the static thrust of a 254 mm airfoil-based propeller at different rotational speeds using CFD, and validate the simulation results against physical load cell measurements from a custom-built test rig.

Project snapshot

Quick details

Role CFD & Design Engineer
Timeline April – December 2024
Industry Aerospace / Propulsion
Deliverable CFD Simulation, Test Rig Design, Experimental Validation
02

Approach and Tools Used

Method

Break the work into clear steps

01

Problem definition

Needed to predict static thrust of a 254 mm two-bladed propeller across RPM range and validate CFD predictions against physical load cell measurements from a custom test rig.

02

Engineering work

Designed the propeller test stand in SolidWorks, including DFM and material selection. Set up a 3D transient CFD simulation in ANSYS Fluent with rotating/static domains, k-ε turbulence model, and unstructured tetrahedral mesh. Manufactured the housing, assisted with Arduino integration, and performed physical assembly using a mechanical press.

03

Validation

Compared CFD thrust predictions (4.39 N at 1400 rpm, 10.1 N at 1500 rpm, 16.9 N at 2000 rpm) against experimental load cell data. Results confirmed the expected T ∝ ω² relationship.

Tool stack

List the tools and methods actually used

Software and hardware used throughout the design, simulation, and validation workflow.

SolidWorks ANSYS Fluent Arduino
ANSYS propeller model screenshot

Propeller geometry in ANSYS Fluent with rotating domain boundary

04

Results / Outcome

Outcome 01

16.9 N

Max thrust at 2000 RPM

CFD-predicted thrust increased monotonically from 4.39 N at 1400 rpm to 16.9 N at 2000 rpm, confirming the expected T ∝ ω² relationship.

Outcome 02

3 RPMs

Simulated and validated

Thrust predictions at 1400, 1500, and 2000 rpm were compared against experimental load cell measurements from the custom-built test rig.

Takeaway

01

What this project proves

End-to-end engineering capability from CAD design and DFM of a test rig, to transient CFD simulation, to physical manufacturing and experimental validation.